Ripoff Report, Soderm


Buy Ripoff Report, SodermCheap Ripoff Report, SodermOrder Ripoff Report, SodermRipoff Report, Soderm Online No PrescriptionRipoff Report, Soderm Online NowRipoff Report, Soderm Without Prescriptions
Customer reviews
LizerginGirl
Secondary treatment options for impotence include injections, inserts, and minor implants.
Scooter
In my opinion, you are making a mistake. I can defend the position. Write to me in PM, we get started.
IntimissiW
Sorry, I thought, and removed his idea
KatenkaOlenka
Erection problems may be a sign of health problems. We have wonderful advice for you!
rnb5555
The article is quite interesting, it is possible in his blog post with her pictures?
ivo-o
God how stupid I was to forget the name of that amazing medication that helped me cure impotence!
tamag
Luckily for you we start a new wholesale of our brand-new erectile dysfunction products!
klop3000
100 methods to enhance sexual sensitivity! Chose one that suits you perfectly!
Maskva05
Hmm ... Each Abram own program.

By consumers, for consumers.

Jill Jones Soderman, Psychotherapist, Mediator, Doctor Jill Jones Soderman, Dr. Jill Jones Soderman, the Healthymind, Jill Jones Solderman Jill Jones Soderman, The Foundation For The Child Victims Of T Fraudster Jill jones soderman is no doctor or even phd Nyack New York

AUTHOR: Jill - (USA)

SUBMITTED: Sunday, March 15, 2015

POSTED: Sunday, March 15, 2015

A note on trying to bully us: Having faced the brutal retaliation of the courts and related government agencies set out to defame, discredit, undermine the credibility of the FCVFC and staff, even questioning that the Foundation exists as a non-profit agency, we chose not to respond to the bullying tactics of liars and cowards.

We ignored blackmail threats expecting that the public would not give any credibility to an anonymous threat. Further, our position has been that anyone who gave credence to vicious, false statements were not clients with whom we would want to engage. Taking on the blood sport tactics of the courts does not square with dealing with clients who are naive or suspicious given the publishing and record of the Foundation's work.

The Foundation has concrete proof of the blackmail threats of individuals who were not clients of the Foundation. Our new resolve is to begin posting the names and facts surrounding this.

When the Foundation files complaints against authorities, complaints are filed with permission of the client and the name of the complainant filing a well documented statement of facts.

A note on threats:

Sometimes people who make threats follow through!

The Foundation and our staff will never give in to threats whether it be with anonymous fraudulent complaints on Rip Off Report ( Refer to the Blog of May 7th 2008 " New York & Thoughts on Jill Jones --Soderman posted below)

or an e mail address set up to collect false complaints through advertising on the internet written by Christine Sirgent the vindictive girl friend who was denied participation in meetings dealing with consultation on her boyfriend's high conflict custody case which had been ongoing for many years. The girl friend was not a party to the action, was not married to the litigant and could potentially testify against the litigant.

The litigant Joshua Clark never paid for an initial extensive document review begun 5/10/2014 and a five hour consultation at the office of an accountant 5/29/2014. The accountant, a member of the Foundation Board wouldhave been a critical part of the forensic team that would have worked on Mr. Clark's case for a minimal fee based on a minimal payment plan offered by Mr. Clark. Mr. Clark and Ms. Sirgent called our office repeatedly, spoke to staff of the Foundation. Out of sympathy for their pleas to meet with us we agreed to review documents and see what help could be offered based on an evaluation of the case. Mr. Clark never paid any part of fees charged by the Foundation though Mr. Clark and Ms. Sirgent placed in writing demands for money from the foundation with the threat that if we did not pay they would write negative comments about the Foundation.

Mr. Clark was dismissed as a client in part because his girl friend Ms. Sirgent proved to be completely out of control as to her demands and interference in the case. In reviewing documents on Mr, Clark's case it appeared that the Court in which his case was being litigated felt the same way. We have a full compliment of the documents, e mailed demands then threats sent by Ms. Sirgent, whom often wrote e mails as if she was in fact Mr. Clark, a fact easily discernible in comparison of writing styles of Ms. Sirgent and Mr. Clark.

While it had been our policy not to respond to cyber bullying, blackmail, various threats, the Foundation Board has currently ruled that any threats to any of our staff will be referred to the police and to our attorneys to avoid the ability of malevolent individuals to anonymously file complaints so they can avoid responsibility for their false allegations. In view of the fact that we have a complete set of documents from which we can prove our position, we have no problem responding to false allegations of those who may run but cannot hide!

Commentary on Rip Off Report

Actual words of Karl Hindle

Report Attachments:

AUTHOR: KARINA - ()

SUBMITTED: Wednesday, November 19, 2014

POSTED: Wednesday, November 19, 2014

Is everyone crazy who disagrees with the poster? Is everyone Jill herself or her cousin/niece/mother/aunt? What a rebuttal. People have different experiences than you, deal with it. What a horrible person you must be to not allow for a difference in opinion. My experience was far different from yours. Sorry if that makes you rage.

Respond to this report!

Are you an owner, employee or ex-employee with either negative or positive information about the company or individual, or can you provide "insider information" on this company?

AUTHOR: StarzzRipOff - ()

SUBMITTED: Thursday, July 10, 2014

POSTED: Thursday, July 10, 2014

If Soderman did not write these rebuttals herself, then whoever wrote them is delusional. Soderman is a fraud and a fake. She preys on vulnerable individuals to take any and all money they may have for a promise to FIX their corrupt family case. She is nothing more than a woman who thinks she talks a good talk, but the bottom line is she has dementia and repeats herself constantly and forgets important facts. She is a complete fraud and people need to stay away from her. She runs from state to state to escape the chaos she creates wherever she goes.

Respond to this report!

Are you an owner, employee or ex-employee with either negative or positive information about the company or individual, or can you provide "insider information" on this company?

AUTHOR: Serena - (United States of America)

SUBMITTED: Saturday, August 11, 2012

POSTED: Saturday, August 11, 2012

I have known Jill Jones Soderman for almost forty years and was present while she was a graduate student. After her PHD she persued further post graduate training in forensics. I was also present when Jill was developing the Foundation.

I am aware of people who attempted to extort money and services from her. As a client, I know that she does not deal with insurance companies in order to protect client confidenciality. Clients are billed for services rendered. In all the years I've known her and referred clients to her, I've never known her to engage in unethical or illegal action.

Both I and the clients I referred have benifited from her services.

Respond to this report!

Are you an owner, employee or ex-employee with either negative or positive information about the company or individual, or can you provide "insider information" on this company?

AUTHOR: Truth10101 - (United States of America)

SUBMITTED: Friday, September 30, 2011

POSTED: Friday, September 30, 2011

Jill helped me and my ex husband weather a very emotional divorce. Even my ex thinks she is amazing. Neither of us has ever had a better therapist. Fearlessly, she has gone after the courts in NJ and elsewhere, and these lies have popped up quite coincidentally. not. Also, she is the one who gets ripped off all the time by patients who do not pay her! I have personal knowledge of at least one of them! She is generous and very very smart. She couldn't rip off someone if she wanted to. it's just not in her makeup.

Respond to this report!

Are you an owner, employee or ex-employee with either negative or positive information about the company or individual, or can you provide "insider information" on this company?

Report & Rebuttal

Respond to this report!

Are you an owner, employee or ex-employee with either negative or positive information about the company or individual, or can you provide "insider information" on this company?

Are you also a victim of the same company or individual? Want Justice? File a Rip-off Report, help other consumers to be educated and don't let them get away with it!

Repair Your Reputation!

Got Reports filed against you? Resolve the issues and rebuild trust through our Corporate Advocacy Program.

Corporate Advocacy Program: The best way to manage and repair your business reputation. Hiding negative complaints is only a Band-Aid. Consumers want to see how businesses take care of business. All businesses will get complaints. How those businesses take care of those complaints is what separates good businesses from bad businesses.

Remove Reports? No! Better yet! Arbitrate to set the record straight!